Macaulay Land Use Research Institute Homepage
Scottish Environment LINK - The voice of Scotland's environment movement

THE STATE OF SCOTLAND'S FARMED ENVIRONMENT 2005

19. Land Management Contract MENU SCHEME

Uptake

The LMC Menu Scheme was introduced for the first time in 2005 and provisional information released by SEERAD (2005b) indicates that about 10,200 farmers have applied under the various options available in the menu representing just under half of all farmers applying under the Single Farm Payment Scheme (Tier 1). This will direct £17 million to farm households financed through modulation of the Single Farm Payment Scheme. The biggest interest and highest uptake has been for a quality assurance scheme, participation in an animal health and welfare programme, improving access and protection of linear landscape features such as dykes and hedges . Conversely, low uptakes have been received for measures such as biodiversity cropping on in-bye, off-farm talks and management of moorland grazing . Table 19.2 summarises the different measures, number of applicants and the projected amount to be spent.

Table 19.2 : Uptake of measures under the LMC Menu Scheme (2005)

 

Measure No of applicants Projected spend (in £k) Area managed
(in ha)

1

Animal health and welfare programme

3949

2500

-

2

Membership of quality assurance scheme

7548

850

-

3

Training

1807

780

-

4

Farm and woodland visits

406

150

-

5

Off-farm talks

275

50

-

6

Buffer areas

880

25

1230

7

Management of linear features

4511

2936

8216 km

8

Management of moorland grazing

233

196

196,000

9

Management of rush pasture

1751

2060

16,500

10

Biodiversity cropping in-bye

58

7

124

11

Retention of winter stubbles

1050

675

16,900

12

Wild bird seed mixture

371

160

490

13

Summer grazing of cattle

419

173

173,000

14

Nutrient management

663

186

93,000

15

Improving access

4145

6885

2400 km

16

Woodland plan

185

31

3000

17

Farm woodland management

162

30

1000

Evaluation

A key element of the LMC Menu Scheme is that there is a free choice as to which measures farmers can apply for. Although consideration was given by SEERAD (in a public consultation) to having some restriction on the choice this has been rejected. The advantage is that such a “free choice menu” approach could potentially allow farmers to incorporate aspects that account for the specific characteristics and structure of their farms. On the other hand, there is a risk that a spatially inconsistent distributed menu of different measures reduces the potential benefit of the scheme. LMCMS applicants, if the application concerns land of an agricultural business, have to adhere to Cross Compliance requirements, as Cross Compliance does apply on all land in agricultural business. Moreover, recipients must adhere to Good Farming Practice. No data of the regional breakdown are available at this stage, but information on the spatial distribution is expected to be available later this year.

Given that the LMC Menu Scheme has just been introduced at the beginning of 2005, it is not possible to assess environmental benefits contributed by this scheme at this time. The ability to evaluate the impact and success of the LMC Menu Scheme will strongly depend on future monitoring systems of the scheme and the implementation of land management plans.

Sources

  • SEERAD (2005a): Land Management Contracts: The LMC Menu Scheme 2005. External Website
  • SEERAD (2005b): Land Management Contract Menu Scheme. News Release.

The Less Favoured Areas Support Scheme >>