|
This component of the project will:
- Analyse
the monoterpene and other phytochemicals among
individual Scots pines
- Quantify
variation in these chemical parameters
across key stage of the Scots pine life cycle
across a range of temporal scales
across a range of spatial scales, from plant
tissues upwards between above and below ground
components of the ecosystem
The genetic basis for chemical
diversity of Scots pine
Genetic data is already available
on the population structure of Scots pine in Scotland.
Isozyme markers (Kinloch et al., 1986), cpSSRs
(developed via a previous SERAD Flexible fund
initiative, commission no: SCR/461/95; Provan
et al., 1998) and mt DNA RFLPs (Sinclair, 1998)
have all shown little evidence of population differentiation
in Scotland, except that some western populations
possess markers consistent with origins from a
separate glacial refugium to other Scottish populations.
However, the overriding picture from neutral markers
is one of high levels of within-, and low levels
of between-population variability (nuclear DNA
FST = 0.028; cpDNA FST = 0.032; mtDNA FST =0.37)
(Kinloch et al., 1986; Provan et al., 1998; Sinclair
et al., 1998, 1999). This is consistent with xenogamous
reproduction via copious quantities of highly
dispersed pollen, along with relatively efficient
seed dispersal (pollen-to-seed flow ratio 18:1;
Ennos et al., 1999). While this virtual panmixia
for neutral markers need not reflect the distribution
of adaptive traits (Karhu et al., 1996; Ennos
et al., 1998), it clearly demonstrates the
high degree of genetic variability among individual
trees within populations. This study will
build on this previous work and investigate the
within-population, between-individual, spatial
distribution of genetically determined monoterpene
variation, an expressed, ecologically relevant
biochemical marker.
Biochemical variation
Genetic differences in coniferous
trees have been studied using monoterpenes and
phenolics as biochemical markers (Yadzani &
LeBreton, 1991). It is conventionally thought
that monoterpenes are under genetic and environmental
control; ratios of individual compounds remaining
constant, whilst overall levels vary with season
and phenology (Langenheim, 1994). However, such
a generality across species appears unlikely (Hartley
et al., 2000). Some studies confirm the responsiveness
of monoterpenes to environmental manipulation
(Muzika et al., 1989), but several studies have
failed to confirm it in conifers including Scots
pine. Monoterpene concentrations and ratios vary
very little under manipulated nutrient, light
and CO2 conditions, in comparison to the very
high genetically-based variability between individuals
of the same provenance (Duncan et al., 1994; Iason
et al., 1996; Heyworth et al., 1998). Responses
in monoterpenes induced by herbivory are also
slight and localised to the area of damage, particularly
in mature trees, which contribute most to the
litterfall (Trewhella et al., 1997). While phenolics
can show environmentally induced variation, due
to light and soil nutrient concentrations in conifers
including Scots pine (Iason et al., 1996, Heyworth
et al., 1998), an underlying genetic base has
been documented. The large magnitude of genetically
determined differences among individuals in phytochemical
composition, and the residual environmentally-induced
variability, is likely to result in much spatial
heterogeneity in phytochemistry. This in turn
is hypothesised to confer spatial heterogeneity
in ecosystem functioning via the broad range of
allelochemic processes in which the secondary
metabolites are involved.
Contact: Vera
Thoss
|